At the moment I am experimenting Dynamic Visual Interactive. One I called it Visual Poetry and The Other One simply caled Dynamic Visual Imagery. Both are listed under the Lab Section.
A snippet of the visual Poetry :
I understand that some literature purist might argue that it will break the mystery of the works. My answer is exactly as the situation when a literature works from other language is translated into other language or a novel was translated into film. I think in a simple words, in my defence, I just want to say that taking the emotion of the literature works into visual imagery, it will invoke and strengthen the perception of the meaning (of the works) - therefore I called my works with this kind of approach as a visual poetry.:
A snippet of the Dynamic Visual Imagery
First, I’d like to emphasize the dynamic terminology I use in this post. Dynamic in my words means un-choreograph, non-linear and less-predictable performance of (machine or body). So every time this “thing” is being executed, It will not generate same result. You will never hear a smart-arse critique say “oh, I’ve seen that”, instead “which version do you see?”
Let’s have a look at the experiments above. As I explained earlier, those effects are generated dynamically means It can be created independently. The translation is: a performer (or an operator – least choice) can change certain variable as they like and it will generate different result according to the variable that he/she changed - a situation for anti-existentialist to challenge their thinking and imagination.
See the details here.
